Lately, I have been looking at this website's traffic. If you were to graph traffic in number of actual people visiting the site and reading the content here, your graph would look a lot like a bell graph, with the highest number of people visiting in the summer months (June through August). This seems reasonable, as new content was being written daily. Looking at the dates and times of my entries in July, for example, it is clear that most of the time I was not writing here, I was asleep.
I fully realize that maintaining anyway near a similar output during the school year would be impossible, unless I was willing to spend all my time writing here instead of writing papers and going to class. Still, I find the idea that less people are reading my thoughts now than were reading in August to be depressing. I have concluded that this is a result of our celebrity-obsessed society.
When people learn I have a website, they often ask one of two questions:
In a nutshell, fame and wealth are the American Dream. We either hope to become wealthy, and thus become famous; or to become celebrities in order to become wealthy. I say "we" because I would like fame and wealth. If I was famous, people would visit this site because they had heard of me. If I was rich, people would visit in hopes of learning the secrets to becoming rich.
Shortly after realizing all of this, I came to a revelation. If I wanted more traffic, I could either become ridiculously famous/wealthy very quickly, or I could compromise this website's integrity by posting seven times a day on flippant issues and ideas that would attract more visitors. Things like celebrities and the same political issues that everyone else is talking about. So I decided to stop thinking about it, and deleted awstats.
 Alas, they are nowhere near these levels.
 Nobody reads Blog Maverick because they are interested in IceRocket; they read it because Mark Cuban made billions in the Internet boom and bought the Dallas Mavericks. Heck, I bet most of you do not even know what IceRocket is.
 Of course, you could argue that this is all meta-blogging, which is the very definition of flippancy.